Auth.js vs Better Auth

Learn how Auth.js and Better Auth differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.

Favicon of Auth.js

Auth.js

Secure authentication for modern web applications
Details:
View Repository
Auth.js screenshot
vs
Favicon of Better Auth

Better Auth

Full-featured TypeScript authentication in minutes
Details:
View Repository
Better Auth screenshot

Feature Comparison

Better Auth has significantly broader feature support than Auth.js, with 25 supported features versus 15.

Auth.js
Better Auth

Magic link and email OTP plugins allow passwordless sign-in using one-time links or codes

Auth.js

Auth.js comes with over 80 preconfigured OAuth providers (Google, GitHub, Twitter, Facebook, etc.) so users can sign in with existing accounts

Better Auth

Supports multiple social providers through built-in OAuth and generic OAuth plugin for custom providers

Auth.js
Better Auth

The passkey plugin adds FIDO2 / WebAuthn support for passwordless, phishing‑resistant sign‑in

Auth.js

Session settings allow adjusting `session.maxAge` and `updateAge` to control how long sessions last; default expiry is 30 days but can be configured for longer durations

Better Auth

Session settings allow you to configure expiresIn and updateAge to create longer or shorter sessions

Auth.js
Better Auth
Auth.js
Better Auth

No official multi‑language or localization support, but a community plugin for localization exists

Compliance Comparison

Neither Auth.js nor Better Auth provide compliance certifications and regulatory frameworks, as both are open source. You’ll need to handle compliance requirements on your own.

,

Command Menu