ZITADEL vs Better Auth

Learn how ZITADEL and Better Auth differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.

Favicon of ZITADEL

ZITADEL

Complete identity infrastructure for modern applications
Details:
View Repository
ZITADEL screenshot
vs
Favicon of Better Auth

Better Auth

Full-featured TypeScript authentication in minutes
Details:
View Repository
Better Auth screenshot

Feature Comparison

ZITADEL has significantly broader feature support than Better Auth, with 35 supported features versus 25. ZITADEL fully covers machine to machine (m2m) authentication and branding and more.

ZITADEL
Better Auth

Magic link and email OTP plugins allow passwordless sign-in using one-time links or codes

ZITADEL
Better Auth

Supports multiple social providers through built-in OAuth and generic OAuth plugin for custom providers

ZITADEL
Better Auth

The passkey plugin adds FIDO2 / WebAuthn support for passwordless, phishing‑resistant sign‑in

ZITADEL
Better Auth

Session settings allow you to configure expiresIn and updateAge to create longer or shorter sessions

ZITADEL
Better Auth
ZITADEL
Better Auth

No official multi‑language or localization support, but a community plugin for localization exists

Compliance Comparison

ZITADEL offers significantly broader coverage than Better Auth, supporting 4 certifications and regulatory frameworks compared to 0 for Better Auth. Since Better Auth is open source and does not include compliance certifications, you’ll need to manage compliance yourself.

ccpa iconCCPACompliant
ZITADEL
Better Auth
gdpr iconGDPRCompliant
ZITADEL
Better Auth
iso-27001 iconISO 27001Certified
ZITADEL
Better Auth
,

Command Menu