Authsignal vs Keycloak
Learn how Authsignal and Keycloak differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.
Authsignal

Keycloak

Feature Comparison
Keycloak offers broader feature coverage than Authsignal , supporting 30 features compared to 24. Keycloak fully covers authentication and machine to machine (m2m) authentication and more, and both tools fully cover branding.
Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods
The session management APIs let you issue, validate, refresh and revoke access tokens and refresh tokens
Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console
The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles
| Authsignal | Keycloak | |
|---|---|---|
Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods | ||
The session management APIs let you issue, validate, refresh and revoke access tokens and refresh tokens | Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console | |
The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles |
Compliance Comparison
Authsignal offers significantly broader coverage than Keycloak, supporting 3 certifications and regulatory frameworks compared to 0 for Keycloak. Since Keycloak is open source and does not include compliance certifications, you’ll need to manage compliance yourself.
| Compliance | Authsignal | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|