Entra External ID vs Keycloak

Learn how Entra External ID and Keycloak differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.

Favicon of Entra External ID

Entra External ID

Secure customer and partner access to any application
Details:
Entra External ID screenshot
vs
Favicon of Keycloak

Keycloak

Secure apps with open source identity management
Details:
View Repository
Keycloak screenshot

Feature Comparison

Both tools offer comparable feature coverage, with Keycloak supporting 30 features and Entra External ID supporting 28. Consider your specific needs regarding authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and extensibility when making your decision. Keycloak fully covers authentication and user management, and both tools fully cover machine to machine (m2m) authentication and branding.

Entra External ID
Keycloak
Entra External ID
Keycloak
Entra External ID
Keycloak
Entra External ID
Keycloak

Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods

Entra External ID

Admins can invalidate refresh tokens and sessions through the Microsoft Entra admin center and specify token lifetimes

Keycloak

Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console

Entra External ID
Keycloak

The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles

Compliance Comparison

Entra External ID and Keycloak lack compliance certifications and regulatory frameworks. Therefore you are responsible for meeting compliance requirements yourself.

,

Command Menu