Ory vs Keycloak

Learn how Ory and Keycloak differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.

Favicon of Ory

Ory

Modern API-first identity stack for secure apps
Details:
View Repository
Ory screenshot
vs
Favicon of Keycloak

Keycloak

Secure apps with open source identity management
Details:
View Repository
Keycloak screenshot

Feature Comparison

Ory offers broader feature coverage than Keycloak, supporting 39 features compared to 30. Ory fully covers extensibility, and both tools fully cover authentication and machine to machine (m2m) authentication and more.

Ory
Keycloak
Ory

Session lifetime can be configured (e.g., 30 days / 720h) via the Ory Console, allowing longer inactivity timeouts for user sessions

Keycloak

Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods

Ory

Ory provides self‑service session management APIs to list and revoke sessions, giving users and admins control over active sessions.

Keycloak

Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console

Ory

The account experience supports multiple languages (English, Spanish, German, French, etc.) and selects the language via the Accept‑Language header

Keycloak

The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles

Compliance Comparison

Ory offers significantly broader coverage than Keycloak, supporting 3 certifications and regulatory frameworks compared to 0 for Keycloak. Since Keycloak is open source and does not include compliance certifications, you’ll need to manage compliance yourself.

,

Command Menu