Casdoor vs Keycloak
Learn how Casdoor and Keycloak differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.
Casdoor

Keycloak

Feature Comparison
Both tools offer comparable feature coverage, with Keycloak supporting 30 features and Casdoor supporting 28. Consider your specific needs regarding authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and extensibility when making your decision. Keycloak fully covers machine to machine (m2m) authentication and user management, and both tools fully cover authentication and branding.
Configuration parameters like SessionOn and inactiveTimeoutMinutes allow enabling sessions and controlling session expiry. Sessions can be stored in Redis or locally
Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods
Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console
The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles
| Casdoor | Keycloak | |
|---|---|---|
Configuration parameters like SessionOn and inactiveTimeoutMinutes allow enabling sessions and controlling session expiry. Sessions can be stored in Redis or locally | Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods | |
Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console | ||
The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles |
Compliance Comparison
Neither Casdoor nor Keycloak provide compliance certifications and regulatory frameworks, as both are open source. You’ll need to handle compliance requirements on your own.