Kinde vs Keycloak

Learn how Kinde and Keycloak differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.

Favicon of Kinde

Kinde

Beautiful, secure authentication that converts
Details:
Kinde screenshot
vs
Favicon of Keycloak

Keycloak

Secure apps with open source identity management
Details:
View Repository
Keycloak screenshot

Feature Comparison

Kinde offers broader feature coverage than Keycloak, supporting 37 features compared to 30. Kinde fully covers extensibility, and both tools fully cover machine to machine (m2m) authentication and branding.

Kinde
Keycloak
Kinde
Keycloak
Kinde

Admins can make sessions persistent and set inactivity timeouts or extend token lifetimes as needed

Keycloak

Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods

Kinde

Control session persistence and timeouts and configure ID, access and refresh token expiry durations

Keycloak

Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console

Kinde
Keycloak

The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles

Compliance Comparison

Kinde offers significantly broader coverage than Keycloak, supporting 6 certifications and regulatory frameworks compared to 0 for Keycloak. Since Keycloak is open source and does not include compliance certifications, you’ll need to manage compliance yourself.

,

Command Menu