Kinde vs Keycloak
Learn how Kinde and Keycloak differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.
Kinde

Keycloak

Feature Comparison
Kinde offers broader feature coverage than Keycloak, supporting 37 features compared to 30. Kinde fully covers extensibility, and both tools fully cover machine to machine (m2m) authentication and branding.
Admins can make sessions persistent and set inactivity timeouts or extend token lifetimes as needed
Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods
Control session persistence and timeouts and configure ID, access and refresh token expiry durations
Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console
The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles
| Kinde | Keycloak | |
|---|---|---|
Admins can make sessions persistent and set inactivity timeouts or extend token lifetimes as needed | Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods | |
Control session persistence and timeouts and configure ID, access and refresh token expiry durations | Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console | |
The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles |
Compliance Comparison
Kinde offers significantly broader coverage than Keycloak, supporting 6 certifications and regulatory frameworks compared to 0 for Keycloak. Since Keycloak is open source and does not include compliance certifications, you’ll need to manage compliance yourself.
| Compliance | Kinde | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|