Auth.js vs Keycloak

Learn how Auth.js and Keycloak differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.

Favicon of Auth.js

Auth.js

Secure authentication for modern web applications
Details:
View Repository
Auth.js screenshot
vs
Favicon of Keycloak

Keycloak

Secure apps with open source identity management
Details:
View Repository
Keycloak screenshot

Feature Comparison

Keycloak has significantly broader feature support than Auth.js, with 30 supported features versus 15. Keycloak fully covers authentication and machine to machine (m2m) authentication and more.

Auth.js

Auth.js comes with over 80 preconfigured OAuth providers (Google, GitHub, Twitter, Facebook, etc.) so users can sign in with existing accounts

Keycloak
Auth.js
Keycloak
Auth.js

Session settings allow adjusting `session.maxAge` and `updateAge` to control how long sessions last; default expiry is 30 days but can be configured for longer durations

Keycloak

Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods

Auth.js
Keycloak

Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console

Auth.js
Keycloak

The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles

Compliance Comparison

Neither Auth.js nor Keycloak provide compliance certifications and regulatory frameworks, as both are open source. You’ll need to handle compliance requirements on your own.

,

Command Menu