ZITADEL vs Keycloak

Learn how ZITADEL and Keycloak differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.

Favicon of ZITADEL

ZITADEL

Complete identity infrastructure for modern applications
Details:
View Repository
ZITADEL screenshot
vs
Favicon of Keycloak

Keycloak

Secure apps with open source identity management
Details:
View Repository
Keycloak screenshot

Feature Comparison

Both tools offer comparable feature coverage, with ZITADEL supporting 35 features and Keycloak supporting 30. Consider your specific needs regarding authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and extensibility when making your decision. ZITADEL fully covers platform, and both tools fully cover machine to machine (m2m) authentication and branding and more.

ZITADEL
Keycloak
ZITADEL
Keycloak
ZITADEL
Keycloak

Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods

ZITADEL
Keycloak

Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console

ZITADEL
Keycloak

The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles

Compliance Comparison

ZITADEL offers significantly broader coverage than Keycloak, supporting 4 certifications and regulatory frameworks compared to 0 for Keycloak. Since Keycloak is open source and does not include compliance certifications, you’ll need to manage compliance yourself.

,

Command Menu