Strivacity vs Firebase Authentication
Learn how Strivacity and Firebase Authentication differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.
Strivacity

Feature Comparison
Strivacity has significantly broader feature support than Firebase Authentication, with 38 supported features versus 22. Strivacity fully covers authentication and machine to machine (m2m) authentication and more, and both tools fully cover branding.
Passkeys are supported through FIDO2 platform authenticators and security keys, allowing biometric or hardware‑based login
Offers a “keep me logged in” option that extends session duration up to 30 days
Supports multiple languages with importable translations
Email templates and FirebaseUI can be localized; set the language with a `languageCode` property or override CSS for more than 40 languages
| Strivacity | Firebase Authentication | |
|---|---|---|
Passkeys are supported through FIDO2 platform authenticators and security keys, allowing biometric or hardware‑based login | ||
Offers a “keep me logged in” option that extends session duration up to 30 days | ||
Supports multiple languages with importable translations | Email templates and FirebaseUI can be localized; set the language with a `languageCode` property or override CSS for more than 40 languages |
Compliance Comparison
Both tools have similar compliance levels, with Strivacity supporting 6 certifications and regulatory frameworks and Firebase Authentication supporting 6.
| Compliance | Strivacity | Firebase Authentication |
|---|---|---|
