Wristband vs WorkOS
Learn how Wristband and WorkOS differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.
Feature Comparison
WorkOS has significantly broader feature support than Wristband, with 38 supported features versus 24. WorkOS fully covers authentication and extensibility, and both tools fully cover machine to machine (m2m) authentication and branding.
Sessions can be configured with idle expiration up to 90 days and absolute expiration up to 365 days, allowing long‑lived sessions
Wristband supports session management via API and user dashboard
| Wristband | WorkOS | |
|---|---|---|
Sessions can be configured with idle expiration up to 90 days and absolute expiration up to 365 days, allowing long‑lived sessions | ||
Wristband supports session management via API and user dashboard | ||
Compliance Comparison
WorkOS offers broader coverage than Wristband, supporting 4 certifications and regulatory frameworks compared to 2 for Wristband.
CCPACompliant
GDPRCompliant
HIPAACompliant
SOC2Compliant| Compliance | Wristband | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| CCPACompliant | ||
| GDPRCompliant | ||
| HIPAACompliant | ||
| SOC2Compliant |
Other tool comparisons to consider
Strivacity vs WorkOS
Stytch vs WorkOS
Kinde vs WorkOS
Better Auth vs WorkOS
Authsignal vs WorkOS
Authgear vs WorkOS
Amazon Cognito vs WorkOS
Entra External ID vs WorkOS
Firebase Authentication vs WorkOS
Clerk vs WorkOS
WorkOS vs WorkOS
Frontegg vs WorkOS
FusionAuth vs WorkOS
Supabase Auth vs WorkOS
