Keycloak vs Firebase Authentication
Learn how Keycloak and Firebase Authentication differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.
Keycloak

Feature Comparison
Keycloak offers broader feature coverage than Firebase Authentication, supporting 30 features compared to 22. Keycloak fully covers authentication and machine to machine (m2m) authentication and more, and both tools fully cover branding.
Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods
Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console
The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles
Email templates and FirebaseUI can be localized; set the language with a `languageCode` property or override CSS for more than 40 languages
| Keycloak | Firebase Authentication | |
|---|---|---|
Session idle and max lifespans and offline sessions can be adjusted to keep sessions alive for longer periods | ||
Admins can view and revoke user and client sessions, sign out all sessions, and configure session lifespans in the admin console | ||
The UI is internationalized. Administrators can enable multiple languages and users can choose their language at login or in the account/admin consoles | Email templates and FirebaseUI can be localized; set the language with a `languageCode` property or override CSS for more than 40 languages |
Compliance Comparison
Firebase Authentication offers significantly broader coverage than Keycloak, supporting 6 certifications and regulatory frameworks compared to 0 for Keycloak. Since Keycloak is open source and does not include compliance certifications, you’ll need to manage compliance yourself.
| Compliance | Keycloak | Firebase Authentication |
|---|---|---|
