Hanko vs Firebase Authentication
Learn how Hanko and Firebase Authentication differ in their key features like authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and compliance, so you can decide which of these authentication providers is best for you.
Hanko

Feature Comparison
Both tools offer comparable feature coverage, with Hanko supporting 25 features and Firebase Authentication supporting 22. Consider your specific needs regarding authentication, enterprise auth, security, user management and extensibility when making your decision. Hanko fully covers authentication, and both tools fully cover branding.
Session duration can be configured between one minute and one month, and users can enable a “stay signed in” persistent cookie
Provides rich session controls including duration, concurrent session limits, cookie retention, self‑service session revocation and token customization
Email templates and FirebaseUI can be localized; set the language with a `languageCode` property or override CSS for more than 40 languages
| Hanko | Firebase Authentication | |
|---|---|---|
Session duration can be configured between one minute and one month, and users can enable a “stay signed in” persistent cookie | ||
Provides rich session controls including duration, concurrent session limits, cookie retention, self‑service session revocation and token customization | ||
Email templates and FirebaseUI can be localized; set the language with a `languageCode` property or override CSS for more than 40 languages |
Compliance Comparison
Firebase Authentication offers significantly broader coverage than Hanko, supporting 6 certifications and regulatory frameworks compared to 0 for Hanko. Since Hanko is open source and does not include compliance certifications, you’ll need to manage compliance yourself.
| Compliance | Hanko | Firebase Authentication |
|---|---|---|
